The Competition Commission of India
(CCI) has found Coal India Limited (CIL) and its subsidiaries to be in contravention
of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act, 2002 for
imposing unfair/ discriminatory conditions in Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs)
with the power producers for supply of non-coking coal.
The Final Order has been passed today
on a batch of informations filed by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company
Ltd. and Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited against Coal India Ltd.
and its subsidiaries (Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Western Coalfields Ltd., South
Eastern Coalfields Ltd.).
The Order has been passed by CCI
pursuant to the directions issued by Competition Appellate Tribunal remanding
the matter back while setting aside the original order of CCI in which a
penalty of Rs. 1773.05 crore had been imposed upon CIL. After hearing the
parties afresh in terms of the directions issued by Competition Appellate
Tribunal, CCI held that CIL through its subsidiaries operates independently of
market forces and enjoys dominance in the relevant market of production and
supply of non-coking coal in India. CCI noted in the order that CIL did not
evolve/ draft/ finalize the terms and conditions of FSAs through a bilateral
process and the same were imposed upon the buyers through a unilateral conduct.
CCI found CIL and its subsidiaries to be in contravention of the provisions of
Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act, 2002 for imposing unfair/
discriminatory conditions in FSAs with the power producers for supply of
non-coking coal.
Apart from issuing a cease and
desist order against CIL and its subsidiaries, CCI has directed modification of
FSAs in light of the findings and observations recorded in the order. The
impugned clauses related to sampling and testing procedure, charging
transportation and other expenses for supply of ungraded coal from the buyers,
capping compensation for supply of stones etc. For effecting the
modifications in FSAs, CIL has been ordered to consult all the stakeholders.
CIL has also been directed to ensure uniformity between old and new power
producers as well as between private and PSU power producers.
Further, CCI has imposed a penalty
of Rs. 591.01 crore upon CIL for the abusive conduct. While reducing penalty,
CCI noted the steps taken by CIL to improve the sampling procedure even
post-passing of the original order by CCI. However, while holding the extant
sampling procedure as unfair, CIL has been directed to incorporate suitable
modifications in fuel supply agreements to provide for a fair and equitable
sampling and testing procedure besides considering the feasibility of sampling
at the unloading-end in consultation with power producers and adopting
international best practices.
The common Order of the Commission has
been passed in Case Nos. 03, 11 and 59 of 2012 and a copy thereof has been
uploaded on the website of CCI at www.cci.gov.in.
****
DSM/KA