Ministry of
Petroleum & Natural Gas has come across several news items appearing in
various newspapers about the CAG report stating that direct LPG subsidy savings
was less than the Government’s claim.
In this regard, it is clarified that an
intensive exercise was carried out for identifying
duplicate/fake/ghost/inactive domestic LPG connections and, as of 01.04.2015,
3.34 Crore such connections were identified by the Oil Marketing Companies
(OMCs). As a result of implementation of DBTL (PAHAL) mechanism, it became
possible to block these 3.34 Crore LPG connections as the subsidy was
transferred in the accounts of only those consumers who had registered under
PAHAL and who have been cleared after de-duplication exercise. Before DBTL, all
or many of these 3.34 crore consumers would have continued to purchase
subsidized cylinders from the distributors. But for the blocking of these
accounts, the subsidy bill would have been much higher despite fall in crude
oil prices.
Estimated Savings from the above efforts
are calculated as follows:
For the financial year (FY) 2014-15, for 3.34 crore consumers
outside the PAHAL net, the Estimated savings would be 3.34 crore x 12 cylinders
x Rs.369.72 (average Subsidy/cylinder for FY 2014-15) equal to
Rs.14,818.4 crore. Following a similar principle, the Savings estimated for FY
2015-16 is Rs.6,443 crore and the total for both the years works out to Rs.
21,261 crores.
|
FINANCIAL YEAR
|
Average Subsidy per Cylinder (for
that year)
|
CALCULATIONS
|
Estimated Savings (in crores of
rupees)
|
|
2014-15
|
Rs. 369.72
|
3.34 * 369.72 * 12
|
14,818.4
|
|
2015-16
|
Rs. 150.82
|
3.56 * 150.82 * 12
|
6,443
|
|
TOTAL
|
21,261.4
|
The total consumption of cooking gas
in any given year is a combination of the number of connections at the
beginning of the year, bogus connections eliminated during the year through the
process of DBT under PAHAL, new connections issued to genuine consumers during
the year and normal fluctuations in individual consumption. Hence, the saving
from implementation of DBT cannot be correctly computed merely by reference to
the total consumption in a year or the total expenditure on subsidy. If the DBT
had not been implemented, the outgo on the subsidy would have been higher by
Rs. 14,818 crore in 2014-15 and Rs. 6,443 crore in 2015-16. Hence the total
savings from the elimination of fake/duplicate/ghost connection as a result of
implementation of DBT for the two years together, as calculated above, is estimated
at more than Rs. 21,000 crore. Since fake/duplicate/ghost connections are
mostly used for diversion, hence it is assumed that the full entitlement would
have been utilised. This figure is not comparable with the actual expenditure
on subsidy which includes the subsidy on new genuine connections given during
these two years. Without implementation of PAHAL, subsidy burden would have
been higher than the actual expenditure recorded during these years, even with
lower petroleum prices.
Furthermore, it should be noted that concrete
evidence of successful elimination of bogus connections is seen in the
phenomenal growth of non-subsidized commercial LPG sales which have registered
an increase of 39.3% in the period April 2015 to March 2016. This is in
contrast to the pre-PAHAL experience when commercial sales growth was
negligible or declining.
*****
YKB/NV