Planning Commission set up an
Inter-Ministerial Task Group for Redressal of Growing
Regional Imbalances in August 2004. The Task Group identified 170 districts on
17 chosen parameters for backwardness including preponderance of agricultural labourers in the population, per capita credit-deposits,
infrastructure and institutional facilities and percentage of Scheduled caste
and Scheduled Tribe as overall proxy for regional backwardness. The Backward
Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) was launched in August 2006. The programme
covering 272 districts continued during the 11th Five Year
Plan. As exercise is
being undertaken to restructure BRGF including identification of backward areas
for the 12th Five Year Plan. No study has been conducted to
identify industrially backward region of the States for their development.
State-wise details of industries set up as reflected in Industrial Investment
Intentions in terms of IEMs filed, Letters of Intent
Issued and Direct Industrial Licence granted during the last three years in the
country is at Annexure 1(A&B).
Details of financial Assistance provided under
Central Capital Investment Subsidy scheme, Central Interest Subsidy Scheme and
Central Comprehensive Insurance Scheme to the Special Category States of
Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh
and Utarakhand are in Annexure 2. From 2002-03 to 2011-12, employment generated was
68,393 in Jammu & Kashmir, 1,05,452 in Himachal Pradesh and 3,18,890 in Utarakhand.
Requests from other states have been received for similar packages, but it has
been the consistent stand of the Government not to announce any fresh package
in view of the fact that the above mentioned special category States have
adverse geographical locations due to hilly and remote terrain and other
specifications. There is no proposal to extend any such incentives to other
States.
Annexure-1A
ANNEXURE 1A REFERRED TO
IN REPLY TO PART(C) OF LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 550 FOR ANSWER ON 13.8.2012 REGARDING ‘SETTING UP OF
INDUSTRIES’
STATEWISE AND YEARWISE
BREAK UP OF INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT INTENTION IN TERMS OF IEMs
FILED/LOIs/DILs ISSUED*
|
NAME OF THE STATE
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012(JUNE)
|
|
Nos
|
Nos
|
Nos
|
Nos
|
|
Andaman
& Nicobar
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Andhra
Pradesh
|
319
|
519
|
392
|
169
|
|
Arunachal Pradesh
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
3
|
|
Assam
|
45
|
37
|
32
|
14
|
|
Bihar
|
32
|
46
|
31
|
12
|
|
Chandigarh
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Chhattisgarh
|
293
|
256
|
114
|
55
|
|
Dadra & Nagar Haveli
|
50
|
63
|
55
|
12
|
|
Daman
& Diu
|
39
|
35
|
21
|
2
|
|
Delhi
|
21
|
19
|
12
|
1
|
|
Goa
|
46
|
39
|
23
|
12
|
|
Gujarat
|
376
|
497
|
544
|
254
|
|
Haryana
|
85
|
141
|
118
|
58
|
|
Himachal
Pradesh
|
41
|
54
|
36
|
34
|
|
Jammu
& Kashmir
|
23
|
23
|
21
|
19
|
|
Jharkhand
|
65
|
53
|
25
|
10
|
|
Karnataka
|
179
|
269
|
217
|
76
|
|
Kerala
|
8
|
8
|
12
|
3
|
|
Lakshadweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Madhya
Pradesh
|
182
|
226
|
191
|
59
|
|
Maharashtra
|
594
|
759
|
975
|
275
|
|
Manipur
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Meghalaya
|
10
|
14
|
6
|
3
|
|
Mizoram
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Nagaland
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Orissa
|
99
|
179
|
119
|
36
|
|
Pondicherry
|
14
|
14
|
8
|
2
|
|
Punjab
|
68
|
103
|
113
|
42
|
|
Rajasthan
|
88
|
125
|
166
|
101
|
|
Sikkim
|
8
|
13
|
15
|
6
|
|
Tamil
Nadu
|
236
|
237
|
258
|
104
|
|
Tripura
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
Uttar
Pradesh
|
176
|
172
|
165
|
63
|
|
Uttaranchal
|
165
|
217
|
80
|
27
|
|
West Bengal
|
206
|
209
|
136
|
44
|
|
Location
in more than One
State
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Total
|
3475
|
4336
|
3900
|
1498
|
*: IEMs:
Industrial Entrepreneur Memoranda filed for delicensed
sector falling under non MSME category LOIs: Letters
of Intent issued; DILs: Direct Industrial Licences granted;
Annexure-1B
ANNEXURE 1B REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART(C)
OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 550
FOR ANSWER ON 13.8.2012 REGARDING ‘SETTING UP OF INDUSTRIES’
|
STATEWISE BREAK UP OF IEMs
IMPLEMENTED BASED ON PART B OF IEM
FORM FILED BY ENTREPRENEURS
|
|
|
|
Name
of the State/UTs
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
(June)
|
|
Andaman
& Nicobar
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Andhra
Pradesh
|
82
|
86
|
86
|
45
|
|
Arunachal Pradesh
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Assam
|
10
|
9
|
13
|
10
|
|
Bihar
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
|
Chandigarh
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Chhattisgarh
|
6
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
|
Dadra & Nagar Haveli
|
9
|
7
|
6
|
3
|
|
Daman
& Diu
|
3
|
13
|
1
|
1
|
|
Delhi
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Goa
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
2
|
|
Gujarat
|
76
|
56
|
50
|
27
|
|
Haryana
|
21
|
13
|
7
|
8
|
|
Himachal
Pradesh
|
7
|
7
|
3
|
5
|
|
Jammu
&Kashmir
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Jharkhand
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
|
Karnataka
|
31
|
19
|
22
|
3
|
|
Kerala
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Lakshadweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Madhya
Pradesh
|
30
|
12
|
11
|
9
|
|
Maharashtra
|
289
|
87
|
120
|
49
|
|
Manipur
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Meghalaya
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Mizoram
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Nagaland
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Orissa
|
1
|
6
|
5
|
1
|
|
Puducherry
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
|
Punjab
|
16
|
7
|
2
|
3
|
|
Rajasthan
|
10
|
27
|
14
|
11
|
|
Sikkim
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
|
Tamil
Nadu
|
39
|
27
|
28
|
7
|
|
Tripura
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Uttar
Pradesh
|
18
|
24
|
20
|
11
|
|
Uttarakhand
|
68
|
159
|
31
|
34
|
|
West Bengal
|
68
|
50
|
33
|
18
|
|
Total
|
804
|
636
|
474
|
255
|
Annexure-2
ANNEXURE 2 REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART(d) TO (g)
OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 550
FOR ANSWER ON 13.8.2012 REGARDING ‘SETTING UP OF INDUSTRIES’
DETAILS OF THE FUND RELEASED UNDER THE
SCHEME VIZ. “PACKAGE FOR SPECIAL CATEGORY STATES” (PLAN) SINCE ITS INCEPTION
(Rupees in crore)
|
S.No
|
Name of the State
|
Scheme
|
2002-03
|
2003-04
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11
|
2011-12
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Jammu & Kashmir
|
Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme
|
NIL
|
2.00
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
4.00
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
5.00
|
19.73
|
30.73
|
|
|
|
Central Interest Subsidy Scheme
|
NIL
|
1.75
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
11.57
|
12.00
|
18.01
|
36.59
|
79.92
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Insurance Scheme
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
0.13
|
3.27
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
J&K Entrepreneurship Development Institute
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
4.60
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
2.86
|
NIL
|
1.80
|
1.93
|
11.19
|
|
|
Total
|
|
NIL
|
3.75
|
4.60
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
4.00
|
14.43
|
12.00
|
24.94
|
61.52
|
125.24+
50.00
(Equity
Share)*
|
|
2.
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme
|
2.50
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
7.00
|
12.00
|
20.00
|
22.57
|
19.00
|
29.84
|
101.37
|
214.28
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2.50
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
7.00
|
12.00
|
20.00
|
22.57
|
19.00
|
29.84
|
101.37
|
214.28
|
|
3.
|
Uttarakh-and
|
Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme
|
2.50
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
7.00
|
9.00
|
5.00
|
23.00
|
18.50
|
10.22
|
75.51
|
150.73
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2.50
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
7.00
|
9.00
|
5.00
|
23.00
|
18.50
|
10.22
|
75.51
|
150.73
|
|
|
Grand Total
|
|
5.00
|
3.75
|
4.60
|
14.00
|
21.00
|
29.00
|
60.00
|
49.50
|
65.00
|
238.40
|
490.25
|
This information was given by the
Minister of State for
Commerce & Industry Shri Jyotiraditya M. Scindia in written reply to a question in Lok Sabha today.
DS/GK