Report of the High Level Committee on Estimation of Saving and Investment
The High Level Committee on Estimation of Saving and
Investment (Chairman: Dr. C. Rangarajan) submitted its Report to the Government
of India on March 16, 2007 in New Delhi.
Constitution of the High Level Committee
The
Government of India appointed a High Level Committee (HLC) on Estimation of Savings
and Investment under the Chairmanship of Dr. C. Rangarajan, the then Chairman
of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister on December 12, 2007 to
critically review the existing methodologies used to estimate saving and investment
aggregates for the Indian economy and suggest measures for improvement.
The HLC had the following composition of Members:
Dr. C. Rangarajan, Honourable Member of Parliament and Former Chairman of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister
is the Chairman. Dr. Kirit Parikh, Member-in-Charge of Perspective Planning Division,
Planning Commission, Prof. Ravindra Dholakia, Indian Institute of Management,
Ahmedabad, Dr. S. L. Shetty, EPW Research Foundation, Dr. Saumitra Chaudhuri,
Member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, Shri Ramesh Kolli, Additional
Director General, National Accounts Division, Central Statistical Organisation,
Government of India and Dr. R.B. Barman, Former Executive Director, Reserve Bank
of India are Members of the HLC. Shri K.U.B. Rao, Adviser, Department
of Economic Analysis and Policy, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was the Member-Secretary
to the Committee. RBI provided Secretariat to the HLC.
Terms of Reference (ToRs)
The ToRs
assigned to the HLC were as follows:
- In the light of the higher growth path
of the economy, to undertake a critical review of the available estimates of domestic
and national saving and investment in the economy, both in the aggregate and its
components with respect to data base, methods of estimation, reliability and interpretational
significance;
- To examine if rapid financial deepening
in the economy is getting duly reflected in the estimates of financial saving
and suggest improvements, if needed;
- To examine the feasibility of directly
estimating household saving through integrated income and expenditure surveys;
- To examine the feasibility of arriving
at separate estimates for pure households, household enterprises and unincorporated
bodies through a suitable method;
- To examine saving in the farm sector in
relation to investments;
- To examine if corporate saving estimation
should be done on marked-to-market basis or the present book value method;
- To suggest improvements in the methods
and procedures used in the estimation of corporate investment and saving;
- To recommend methods of strengthening public
sector saving and investment estimates by taking account of municipalities, city
corporations, gram panchayats and other local Governments on the one hand and
increased private participation in public investments on the other;
- To examine the empirical methods and procedures
used in the estimates based on commodity-flow-method and flow-of-funds method
and suggest improvements therein;
- To suggest new data bases, if any, to be
devised/built-up for improving the reliability or checking validity of the estimates;
and
- To review the existing methodology and
suggest improvements in the estimation of capital formation at the regional level.
Background to the setting up
of the HLC
Estimation
of gross domestic saving and investment has assumed critical significance in the
recent times when the Indian economy is undergoing rapid structural changes in
the income levels and saving behavior. In
pursuance of this overriding objective, the HLC set out certain distinctive approaches
to be adopted so that the aims of improving the data quality not only for unorganised
sectors but also for organised sectors, minimising the data gaps and ensuring
revalidation of the data bases are achieved. The HLC followed a sector-wise approach
for reviewing the estimation procedure and accordingly, four Sub-Committees were
set up keeping in view the relatively large number of ToRs assigned to it and
the intricacies involved in the estimational issues of savings and investment.
The major elements of the Committee’s approach
were along the following lines:
- Keeping in view the complexities
involved in estimating savings and investment from various sectors, there is a
need to improve the present data base and methodologies adopted for different
sectors of the economy – both organised and unorganised.
- The ‘rates and ratios’ underlying
the present methods for estimation of saving and investment, namely, the flow-of-funds
(FoF) and commodity flow methods need to be periodically reviewed and reassessed.
- To the extent possible, a shift
from sample-based estimates of savings and investment to a census based one, particularly
for the private corporate sector, would be useful.
- To achieve robustness of the
savings and investment estimates, cross-validation of the estimates across databases
and methodologies holds the key. Towards this pursuit, the HLC has undertaken
detailed sector-wise exercises to generate newer databases and methodologies.
- The Committee undertook a major
initiative of sensitising the apex financial institutions and its interaction
with the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) constituted important elements
of the approach followed for developing alternative data bases for estimation
and cross-validation of the existing estimates. The apex financial bodies [namely,
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Insurance Regulatory Development
Authority (IRDA), National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD)
and National Housing Bank (NHB)] have agreed to assist the Government of India
and Reserve Bank of India to provide information pertaining to different financial
instruments under their regulatory purview regularly to ensure smooth flow of
data from diverse primary sources for developing alternative data bases. This
is in addition to the information they are already providing under the existing
procedure.
Major Recommendations of HLC
Household Sector Savings
Estimation
1.
The HLC has recommended that there is a need to undertake
a comprehensive income- expenditure survey for households. In order to pave way
for eventual introduction of periodical comprehensive survey, the NSSO has agreed
to undertake such a survey for households with a pilot survey to begin with, in
the year 2010-11. The survey will provide an alternative data base for direct
estimation of household savings for cross-validation of the present estimates.
It is imperative that the survey of income and expenditure of 'pure households'
needs to be taken up concurrently with the Enterprise Survey.
2.
The present method of estimation of savings needs
to be strengthened through regular updation of rates and ratios and development
of alternative data bases for constant cross-validation of the estimates.
The HLC
has recommended specifically for each instrument of household financial savings
through a ‘worksheet approach’ as follows:
Treatment of Currency Holdings by
Households
3.
The currency held by households as per the latest
available flow-of-funds data be considered for the purpose of estimating the currency
component for the household sector’s financial savings estimation. The HLC recommends
compilation of flow-of-funds data in a more timely manner to consider different
ratios including the ratio of households’ cash holding on a more realistic basis.
Treatment of Bank Deposits
4.
RBI’s annual survey on ‘Composition and Ownership
Pattern of Scheduled Commercial Bank Deposits’ needs to be looked at for further
refinement in terms of : (a) representative nature of the sample, (b)margin of
error, and (c) Reduction in time-lag.
5.
There is a need to capture institutions like Non-
Government Organisations (NGOs) and self-help groups (SHGs) in the returns for
deposits provided by banks to the RBI.
6.
There is a need to standardise the database for the
estimation of household deposits by using consistently the March 31 figure in
place of the last reporting Friday of March. This is available for every year
with a lag of three to four months.
Treatment of Co-operative Bank Deposits
7.
NABARD should be involved in providing a projection
of household deposits in co-operative banks and credit societies to get around
the problem of considerable time-lag in the publication such as ‘Statistical Statements
Relating to the Co-operative Movement in India (Credit
and Non-credit societies)’.
8.
All efforts should be undertaken to improve the time
gap in the publication ‘Statistical Statements Relating to the Co-operative Movement
in India (Credit
and Non-credit societies)’.
9.
NABARD should continue in its role as the nodal agency
for the co-operative sector and provide data for the compilation of national accounts,
savings estimates and FoF accounts in so far as the cooperative sector is concerned
10.
The HLC’s recommendations pertaining to cooperative
credit societies may be applied to cooperative non-credit societies.
Treatment
of Deposits with Non-banking Companies
11.
A census should be conducted
on a regular basis, say once in five years, covering all companies incorporated
with the Department of Company Affairs. The census should collect data on assets,
liabilities, income and expenditure of NBFCs including the unregistered/exempted
category of NBFCs. The census should be conducted by DSIM, RBI in collaboration
with the Department of Company Affairs, Government of India, if necessary by outsourcing
the same. This is in consonance with the recommendations made earlier by the Committee
on Informal Financial Sector Statistics, 2001 (Chairman: P. Venkataramaiah).
12.
In respect of companies registered with the RBI,
the RBI should provide the necessary details of deposits of public. For the unregistered
companies, sample studies will have to be undertaken.
Treatment
of Life Insurance Funds
13.
IRDA should be involved
in the household financial savings estimation by way of providing regular information
on ‘life funds’ consolidated for all insurance institutions – both in the public
and private sector in the format prescribed in the Report.
14.
The RBI may approach the
IRDA to provide combined balance sheet for all insurance institutions – public
and private - as per the flow-of-funds format.
Treatment of Provident and Pension
Funds
15.
The Provident Fund Regulatory
and Development Authority (PFRDA) should collect and disseminate information on
pension funds on a regular basis.
Treatment of Claims on Government
16.
The HLC recommends that
an appropriate format as prescribed in this Report on the ownership pattern of Government securities
(consolidated for all levels of Government), comprising six categories, viz., 1) Government,
2) Banks, 3) Financial Sector other than Banks, 4) Non-Service Sector (Corporates,
Firms and Societies), 5) External Sector and 6) Household Sector, may be prepared
by the RBI.
Treatment of Shares, Bonds, Debentures
and Units of Mutual Funds
17.
The HLC recommends the involvement of the SEBI
in providing information on a regular basis to the RBI on areas like annual subscription
to public issues of shares, debentures, mutual funds and commercial bonds (each
separately and consolidated for all depositories) as per the ownership categories
(categories of subscribers are Qualified Institutional Investors, FIIs, NRIs, corporate, trusts and other categories) from
which the RBI will extract household investment in shares, debentures, mutual
funds and commercial bonds for household financial savings estimation. Registrars/Depositories/AMFI
need to be involved for regular data support. Henceforth, the SEBI would arrange
to collect the required data from these entities.
18.
The HLC recommends that
the consolidated Statements of assets/liabilities of all capital market institutions
(namely, merchant bankers and registered brokers) should be compiled by the SEBI
or have them compiled and forwarded to RBI for compilation of flow-of-funds account
of the Indian economy.
19.
In view of the back dated
Survey of Ownership of Capital of Joint Stock Companies as on end-March 1995,
there is a need to update this at least once in five years. The SEBI may look
into the modalities of conducting such a survey.
20.
The CSO should forward requisite
formats to SEBI for estimation of savings, capital formation and GDP for the bodies
under the regulatory purview of SEBI.
Treatment of Trade Debt
21.
Till the MCA 21 data is
available and can be used for the purpose of financial savings estimation under
trade debt, the existing methodology of computing trade debt may be continued.
Global paid-up capital series needs to be provided to the RBI by the Ministry
of Corporate Affairs.
Treatment
of Financial Liabilities of the Households
22.
The HLC recommends that as BSR data on bank credit
is available with a lag of one year, proportion of the previous year may be applied
wherever necessary.
23.
CSO should present the total
household savings as: [Gross Financial Assets + Physical Assets – Financial Liabilities],
instead of the present practice of reporting as: [Net financial savings (i.e.,
Gross Financial Assets – Financial Liabilities + Physical Assets].
It would be appropriate for the CSO to present household financial savings
by instruments in gross terms and not net of respective liabilities. In addition,
for presenting household savings in form of financial assets, the estimate would
consist of gross financial assets less financial liabilities.
New Data Bases
24.
There is a need to continuously
monitor the emergence of new instruments for incorporating them in the savings
estimates. Accordingly, new data base for such instruments need to be developed.
25.
New databases should be
devised/built-up for improving the reliability or checking validity of the estimates
of household savings. There is a possibility of involving the other apex bodies
such as IRDA, SEBI and NHB for the purpose of building up an alternative database
in respect of financial instruments under their regulatory purview The HLC recommends
creation of a regular data supply mechanism from the apex bodies to the RBI for
which specific forms will be supplied. Going forward, it is also envisioned that
all the apex bodies are engaged in the ongoing review of the data on household
financial savings from the following standpoints: (i) identification of the database used; (ii)
methodology prescribed and in practice used; (iii) validating the data as well
as results; and (iv) comment on changes required in the procedure.
26.
There is a need for field
studies by different institutions like CSO and NSSO for developing new databases.
The appropriate case studies and type studies to be undertaken may be funded by
CSO and RBI.
Institutional Support for
Statistics
27.
National Statistical Commission
should identify units in NSSO, CSO and the Research Departments in the RBI for
strengthening them through appropriate staffing so that in future statistical
exercises like Income-Expenditure Survey, Company Finance Studies, BSR, FoF and
similar exercises can be completed expeditiously at these organisations.
Private Corporate Sector Savings
28.
The HLC suggests using MCA21 data for estimating savings
and capital formation of non-Government non-financial companies and non-banking
financial companies. Once data quality and reporting issues are resolved, it is
suggested to do away with the present methodology and implement direct aggregation
method based on MCA21 data.
29.
In addition to estimating the corporate savings and
capital formation for the non-Government and non-financial companies and non-banking
financial companies using the present blow up factor methodology, estimates may
be made using MCA21 global data from the year 2008-09. The two sets of estimates
may be compared for improving coverage and quality of MCA21 data base. It is expected
that MCA21 data base would stabilise by 2010-11 and accordingly, the HLC recommends
that savings and investment estimates from the year 2010-11 may be made using
MCA21 data for all companies, dispensing with the blow up factor method.
30.
The HLC suggests including the following additional
data fields in Form 23ACA submitted under MCA21 as (a) net amount transferred
to reserves, (b) net amount transferred to Balance sheet, (c) capital gains (+)/losses(-),
and (d) income(+)/expenditure(-) related to previous years. In addition, it was
decided that net deferred tax liability could be taken from balance sheet as a
difference in current year and previous year figure, which is already being captured
in Form 23AC. The HLC also indicated including two additional data fields, viz.,
non-producible intangible assets and revaluation of fixed assets in Form 23AC.
31.
The HLC suggests including the following items in
the balance sheet structure in Form 23AC as (a) public deposits, (b) trade debt,
(c) loans and advances to public (including Directors and employees), (d) investment
in Government securities, (e) cash at hand and (f) bank balances.
32.
There are few other indicators relating to private
corporate sector activity which are envisaged to be critically important to banking
sector and national economy. Inclusion of those items in 23AC would facilitate
better understanding between corporate performance and bank lending. In this context,
the HLC suggests including (a) borrowing from banks (under ‘Secured Loans’) and
(b) borrowing from banks (under ‘Un-secured Loans’). In addition, it is worthwhile
to include reporting of installed capacity (under ‘Turnover details of three principal
products’, Form 23ACA) to build up a ‘capacity utilisation index’ at national
level. Further, the HLC suggests MCA to explore collection of information on different
types of employment from companies.
33.
As regards the data quality issues between two databases
that are maintained by the MCA and RBI, the HLC suggests that data definitions
must be unique, and the practice and definitions followed in RBI company finance
studies should be implemented in MCA21 data so that these two datasets are consistent
and comparable. In addition, the metadata issues and sources of discrepancy should
be sorted out mutually between MCA and RBI.
34.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs to explore the likely
benefits from adopting XBRL platform for its' MCA 21 database.
35.
ICAI to work with the MCA towards inclusion of MCA
21 database under the XBRL platform.
36.
The HLC feels that basing savings estimates on ‘mark
to market basis’ may not be apt as it may lead to wide fluctuations from one reporting
period to the next even when the underlying fundamentals do not change. Moreover,
absence of liquid market for various types of assets also makes such estimation
inappropriate.
Estimation of Public Sector Savings
37.
The HLC recommends creation of a separate category
for Quasi-Government Bodies in
the CSO’s estimates of GDP, consumption expenditure, savings and capital formation.
Regarding capital grants made by the Central and State Governments to the
autonomous Government institutions, the HLC recommends that these grants should
be treated as revenue expenditure in the donor’s accounts (which will reduce their
savings), and included in the total receipts of the donee’s (which will show corresponding
increase in the savings, if the capital grants are utilised for acquisition of
fixed assets).
38.
The CSO should make separate estimates of GDP, consumption
expenditure, savings and capital formation for the Local Bodies.
These could best be prepared based on census of Urban Local Bodies and
on sample basis in the case of Rural Local Bodies.
For this purpose, the States may be provided financial assistance and training
by the CSO to undertake analysis of Local Bodies’ accounts.
39.
The CSO, instead of analysing Profit and Loss Accounts
of all the UTI schemes
separately, should explore the feasibility of using consolidated data of all mutual
funds which is available with the Association of Mutual Fund.
40.
The CSO or the Planning Commission or the nodal agencies
for the PPPs, should
obtain the annual accounts of the PPPs in the
private sector and analyse them for the purpose of estimating savings and capital
formation made by them.
41.
The HLC recommends that the CSO should include the
capital expenditures of Defence on construction, ordinance factories and defence
establishments as capital formation.
Estimation of Capital Formation
42.
For operational convenience, only one figure of capital
formation arrived at through savings route should be used for compiling aggregate
rates of capital formation as is being done at present.
43.
Keeping in view the fact that the quality of estimates
of savings of households in physical assets depends indirectly on the overall
estimates of GCF arrived through commodity-flow approach, the HLC recommends regular
updation of rates and ratios used in this approach.
44.
The rates and ratios used in the estimation of various
types of capital goods should be updated through small type studies to be conducted
with the help of the State Governments and other research institutions, such as
agro-economic research centres.
45.
Efforts should be made to estimate the value of materials
other than cement, iron & steel, bricks, furniture & fittings and timber
so that the ratio used for blowing up other materials could be brought down. It
was also recommended that ratios used for factor payments should be revised at
the time of base year revision.
46.
Filing of returns of both public sector and private
sector projects under PPPs should be made mandatory under provision of Indian
Statistical Act.
47.
The Steering Committee of the NSSO may be requested
to launch annual survey of non-manufacturing enterprises or annual enterprise
surveys focusing on larger enterprises which maintain annual accounts for collecting
data on income, expenditure and capital formation.
48.
Expressing concern about the deteriorating quality
of ASI data, the HLC observed that adequate staff/logistic and infrastructural
support are required to improve the quality of ASI data, besides taking measures
to simplify the ASI schedule, electronic submission of ASI returns, increasing
the coverage of census factories and releasing separate data for the census factories.
49.
CSO should devise suitable procedures, including the
usage of central excise databases on production, to cover total production as
far as medium and large scale industrial undertakings are concerned, in respect
of the commodities included in the item-basket of IIP.
50.
CSO may explore preparing an alternative index of
sales/total income by taking into account both industry and service activities
in the country based on quarterly financial results announced by the listed companies.
Capital
Formation at Regional Level
51.
The Steering Committee of the NSSO may be requested
to launch annual survey of non-manufacturing enterprises or annual enterprise
surveys focusing on larger enterprises which maintain annual accounts for collecting
data on income, expenditure and capital formation. The surveys should be designed in such a manner
that reliable estimates of capital formation are available, for each State - however
small or big it is. This is particularly important for the north-east States and
the newly formed States.
52.
The Steering Committee of the NSSO should be requested
to launch annual enterprise surveys, which should provide reliable data on capital
formation at the State level and by industry.
53.
Regarding GSDP
at market prices, the States should attempt to release this data by adding indirect
taxes net of subsidies to the GSDP at factor cost (which follows income-originating
concept). For the Centre’s part of these taxes and subsidies (including indirect
subsidies from the Centre in each State), which is difficult to estimate
but possible, efforts should be made to estimate the same.
54.
The States
may also try to estimate savings by subtracting private final consumption expenditure
and government final consumption expenditure from the estimated GSDP at market
prices. The States can derive this data from the NSS Consumer Expenditure surveys
by suitably adjusting to the differences between consumption expenditure data
shown in NSS and NAS.
55.
Enterprise
surveys should be conducted with suitable sample size for estimation of capital
formation by industry and by States. Till such time, alternate methods like working
out capital output ratios, using ASI data at two digit level and studying its
variations with all India capital output ratios may be tried for estimating capital
formation at the State level.
Treatment of pure households (consumer
households)
56.
The HLC feels that the three
steps suggested below will enable the disaggregated estimation of household savings
in future to some extent:
(i)
Detailed instrument-wise
data of select financial savings in respect of pure households, farmers, household
enterprises and unincorporated bodies, if made available by the concerned institutions.
(ii)
Once the comprehensive income–expenditure
survey of the household sector is available, an attempt can be made to estimate
the savings of the pure households.
(iii)
An appropriate design of
the survey format is important in this context to be able to obtain the State-level
estimates of savings for the components of the household sector.
Treatment of Current Transfers
57.
As of now, the treatment
of remittances in vogue i.e., the CSO treating remittances as a part of personal disposable income and the FoF accounts
continuing to capture remittances’ impact on instruments of savings to the extent
they get embedded in the domestic sector through increase in the household financial
savings instruments, namely, deposits, insurance, shares and debentures, etc)
may be continued till we completely switch over to the direct (survey) method
of estimation of household savings.
The recommendations made by the HLC are wide-ranging, aiming at improving
the quality of data, minimizing the data gaps and validating the data that is
used for estimating the savings and investment. The HLC believes that when implemented,
these recommendations would ensure that the savings and investment estimates would
be more robust and useful as policy inputs.
NNK/
(Release ID :48297)