Solution of water disputes between states
The water dispute arises among two or more State Governments
when the Central Government receives request under Section 3 of the Act from any
of the basin States with regard to existence of water dispute as per the Inter-State
River Water Disputes (ISRWD) Act, 1956. The details of the present inter-State water
disputes under ISRWD Act, 1956 are as follows:
|
S.No. | River/Rivers | States concerned | Date of Reference to the Central Government | Date of Reference to the Tribunal |
| 1. |
Ravi & Beas |
Punjab, Haryana
and Rajasthan |
____ |
April, 1986 |
| 2. |
Cauvery |
Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Union Territory of Pondicherry |
July, 1986 |
June, 1990 |
| 3. |
Krishna |
Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra |
September, 2002 - January, 2003 |
April, 2004 |
| 4. |
Madei/Mondovi/Mahadayi |
Goa, Karnataka and Maharashtra |
July, 2002 |
- |
| 5. |
Vansadhara |
Andhra Pradesh & Orissa |
February, 2006 |
- |
In accordance with the said Act, the Central Government is
required to refer a dispute to a Tribunal after it is satisfied that the dispute
cannot be settled by negotiations. Accordingly,
the water disputes related to Cauvery and Krishna were referred to the Tribunals for
adjudication in 1990 and 2004 respectively. The
Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) submitted report
and decision under section 5(2) of the ISRWD Act, 1956 on 5.2.2007. Party States and Central Government have sought
guidance/ clarification from the tribunal under section 5(3) of the Act. Further, party State have
also filed Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court against the report
and decision of the tribunal as mentioned above. The Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal
passed orders on Interim Relief Applications of the States on 9.6.2006.
The water dispute related to Ravi
& Beas was referred to the Ravi
& Beas Waters Tribunal (RBWT) in 1986 under Section
14 of the said Act. RBWT submitted its
report on 30.1.1987 under section 5(2) of the Act. Party States and Central Government have sought
explanation/guidance under section 5(3) of the Act from the Tribunal. The Tribunal has not submitted its further report
to the Government.
In respect
of Mahadayi/Mandovi River Water Disputes raised by Government
of Goa, the Ministry of Water Resources is of the opinion
that water dispute contained in the request of Government of Goa cannot be settled by negotiation. Meanwhile, the Government of Goa filed a suit in the Supreme Court for setting up of Water
Dispute Tribunal for adjudication of above River Water Dispute and an Interlocutory
Application (IA) for stay in construction activity in September 2006.
In respect of Vansadhara
Water Dispute, the Central Government has not concluded so far that the dispute
cannot be settled by negotiations. Meanwhile, the Government of Orissa has filed a Writ Petition in this regard in September,
2006 in the Supreme Court.
Government
has already enacted Inter-State Water Disputes Act in 1956 for adjudication of
water disputes and amended the same in 2002 for time-bound adjudication of the
disputes and the Act is now called as Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.
This information was given by the Minister of State for Water Resources, Shri Jai Prakash Narayan Yadav in response to a question
by Shri Shantaram Laxman Naik and Shri Jai Prakash Aggarwal in the Rajya Sabha today.
SK/BS
(Release ID :37700)