Following is the
full text of the Statement by Shri Prafl Patel, Minister of Civil Aviation in
the Rajya Sabha today in response to the Calling Attention Motion tabled by
Shri P. Rajeeve, MP, Rajya Sabha regarding “Serious safety problems faced by
airline industry in the country in the context of Mangalore aircraft crash”:
“Flight IX 812
of Air India Express operating from Dubai to Mangalore on Boeing 737-800
aircraft, was involved in an unfortunate accident on 22nd May 2010
while landing at Mangalore airport.
There were 160 passengers and 6 crew members on Board. While all crew members lost their lives, 8
passengers managed to survive the crash.
The
weather on that day was conducive for landing and the visibility was 06
KMs. The runway was dry and ATC
clearance had been given for Instrument Landing System (ILS) approach landing
on Runway 24. As per Manufacturer
requirements, the runway length for Boeing 737 – 800 type of aircraft should be
7500 feet. The runway at Mangalore
airport is 8100 feet in length.
The
aircraft was new. It was delivered on 15th January, 2008 and
made its first commercial flight on 25th
January, 2008. The aircraft
did not have any reported history of technical snag.
The flight was under the command of Capt. Zslatko Glucika, age 55 years, who had a
total flying experience of 10,215 hours, out of which 2844 hours was on Boeing 737 – 800 type of
aircraft and he had 7630 hours of experience as Pilot-in-Command (PIC). The PIC
had also successfully cleared the language proficiency test prescribed by
DGCA. The Co-Pilot, Capt. H.S.
Ahluwalia, age 40 ½ years, had a total
flying experience of 3619 hours of which 3319 hours was on Boeing 737 – 800
type of aircraft.
DGCA has specified Flight Duty
Time and Flight Time limitations by way of Aeronautical Information Circular
No. 28/1992 dated 10th
December, 1992 . As per these limitations for international flights
with two pilot crew no air carrier may schedule a flight crew to fly for more
than nine hours of flight time during any 24 consecutive hours without a rest
period. The PIC
was on vacation and joined on 19th
May, 2010. He was given rest
till evening of 21st of May, 2010.
He took a flight (IC – 811) at 09.30 PM
on 21st May, 2010
and was assigned flying duty for flight No. IX – 812 on 22nd May, 2010. The co – pilot had earlier been assigned
flying duties on 18th May,
2010 at 06.00 AM and was
given rest on 19th, 20th and 21st of May, 2010
before being assigned flight duty on flight IX – 812 on 22nd May, 2010. In the case of the crew of the ill – fated
aircraft the flight time recorded was 8 hours and 35 minutes and adequate rest
was provided to the crew.
Both the
pilots were fairly experienced in landing and take-offs from Mangalore airport.
While the PIC had made 19 takeoffs and
landings here, the Co-Pilot had made 66 takeoffs and landings.
The PIC was a British
National and had Serbian licence. As per
the Rule 45 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, the Central Government has the power
to validate licences granted by the duly competent authority in any foreign
State and which for the time being in force, for the purpose of flying aircraft
registered in India. This power has been
delegated to DGCA depending on demand
and availability of Indian Commanders.
The delegation is valid till 31st
July 2011. Under the above delegation,
DGCA issues Foreign Aircrew Temporary Authorisation (FATA). The FATA of the PIC
of the ill – fated aircraft was valid till 31st July, 2010.
Out of
158 persons who died in the accident, interim compensation of Rs. 10 lakh to
each adult deceased passenger; Rs. 5 lakh to each passenger below the age of
12; and Rs. 2 lakh to each injured passenger has been fixed. This interim compensation has been paid
to the next of kin of 127 out of 128
adult passengers who lost their lives and to all 20 children, 4 infants and 8
injured passengers. One passenger whose
family members are in Dubai, due to
unavoidable circumstances could not travel to India
to claim interim compensation.
Arrangements are being made to settle the claim in Dubai
itself. Also interim compensation to 5 of the 6 crew members have been
disbursed. In the case of the Commander
Capt. Zslatko Glucika, whose family is in Belgrade,
NACIL is in the process of distributing the interim compensation. An amount of
Rs. 14.56 crores has been disbursed towards the above till date. It will be
pertinent to mention here that the final compensation has to be assessed in
accordance with the provisions of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972, which
incorporates the Montreal Convention. Under this Convention, the amount of
compensation is to be worked out in each case separately on “proof of loss
basis”. It is the endeavour of the Ministry to secure maximum compensation to
the family members of the deceased as per Montreal
convention. In 40 such cases, Air India Express has almost finalized the extent
of final compensation as per the Montreal Convention. For the rest, process is underway.
A
Court of Enquiry headed by Air Marshal (Retd.) B.N. Gokhale has been set up
under Rule 75 of the Aircraft Rules 1937 on 3.06.2010. The Court is expected to submit its Report by
31st August 2010.
After the tragic crash, a Civil
Aviation Safety Advisory Council (CASAC) has been set up in DGCA under the
Chairmanship of Director General of Civil Aviation with 28 expert members from
industry and stakeholders who have made significant contribution in aviation
sector. The Council has constituted 4 different working groups for (i)
Operations, (ii) Airworthiness, (iii) Air Navigation and (iv) Aerodromes. The
Council can also invite international experts from ICAO, FAA, EASA, Boeing,
Airbus etc. Based on the above safety
issues directions were issued to all concerned regarding adherence to SOPs –
Stabilized approach for safe landing; Approach and Landing Reduction(ALAR)/
Monsoon training; Review of missed approach – ‘Go around’ encouraged in case of
un-stabilized approach; Hard landing not punitive – when within limits;
Presence of Cabin crew in cockpit in case of one pilot leaving the cockpit –
log to be maintained by Sr. Cabin Crew; Cabin Crew to interact with pilots on
intercom during period of lean cockpit activity; In the event of incapacitation
of PIC, copilot to take over control and in
the event of PIC not responding to calls of
copilot regarding ‘go around’, assertiveness by copilot to be encouraged.
DGCA
vide order dated 2nd June 2010 has decided that a team
of officials from the Aerodrome and Flight Standard Directorate shall carry out
special audit of airports identified as critical on a priority basis and shall
review thoroughly the system and facilities at these aerodromes and also review
any other assessment derived from the aerodrome specific restrictions. Recommendations of the audit would be
implemented by AAI within 1 month, at its
airports, while for Defence airports, matter would be taken up with Defence
Ministry for the implementation. 11
airports have been identified as critical, namely: Agartala, Calicut,
Jammu, Kullu, Latur, Leh, Lengpui,
Mangalore, Patna, Port Blair and
Shimla.
DGCA has also issued Operations Circular 12 of 2010 on 1st June 2010 impressing
upon all Scheduled/Non-Scheduled/General Aviation Operators to strictly adhere
to the standard operating procedures for approach and landing that would result
in decent landings acceptable within the limitations of the aircraft without
compromising stopping distance requirements.
I would also like to mention here that DGCA is committed
to sustain and enhance a robust safety oversight system through proactive
regulation and its strict compliance.
The challenge before DGCA is to manage phenomenal growth of air traffic
without compromising on aviation safety.
DGCA has taken various initiatives to ensure safe operations, some of
which I would like to highlight here.
A Surveillance and Enforcement Division has been set up in
DGCA for preparation and monitoring of the Annual Surveillance Programme. The Division coordinates monthly meetings to
review the surveillance conducted and a database of all findings detected during
surveillance is maintained and monitored.
While, DGCA conducted 4327 surveillance activities in 2009, this year,
4788 activities have been planned and a substantial number of enforcement
action has been taken.
A Board for Aviation Safety
(BFAS) has been set up to resolve and monitor the progress of enforcement of
deficiencies noted during surveillance.
The BFAS also determines enforcement actions against the approval
holders based on the seriousness of the deficiencies observed. To promote sharing of safety information by
all stakeholders, the findings are displayed in a de-identified form on DGCA’s
website. This approach will help in
identifying and dealing with safety threats before they result in any mishap.
DGCA has also started evaluating the financial health of
scheduled airlines and its impact on safety and is in the process of framing
regulations to ensure that safety is not compromised on account of financial
distress of airlines.
Three ICAO technical projects in the areas of flight
safety, aerodrome standards and navigation services have been commissioned by
DGCA to enhance its safety oversight capabilities. The aerodrome project has just been completed
and ICAO findings in the identified areas have been addressed. The other two projects are underway and are
expected to be finalized soon.
An Aviation Regulatory Advisory Panel (ARAP) with eight
Working Groups has been set up to review existing regulations in airworthiness,
flight operations, flight safety, licencing, air transport services and air
navigation services. The panel will
study the best international practices and globally harmonized standards and
suggest revision in current regulations wherever required.
The concept of Safety Management System (SMS), recommended
by ICAO is also under consideration and a draft regulation for the same is
under process.”
***
MC/MK