The Minister of State (Independent
Charge) Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation Shri Bharatsinh Madhavsinh
Solanki chaired the National Consultations with State Ministers incharge of
Rural Drinking Water Supply in New Delhi today.
In his address to the Ministers of State Governments incharge of Rural
Drinking Water, Secretaries and officials of State Governments, representatives
of Ministries of Central Government, representatives of multilateral agencies
and non-governmental organisations, Shri Bharatsinh Solanki said that provision
of adequate and safe drinking water supply in rural areas is one of the
fundamental responsibilities of the Governments, both at the State as well as
the Central levels.
The text of the Speech by the Minister of State (Independent Charge)
Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation Shri Bharatsinh Madhavsinh Solanki
is as follows:
“You may be aware
of the Census 2011 figures that indicate that nearly 85% of the rural
population get drinking water from safe sources like handpumps, tap water and
covered wells. The remaining 15% of households depend on uncovered wells and
other unimproved sources like rivers, springs, ponds etc. Covering them with
improved sources should be our priority. Moreover, about 22% of rural
households have to fetch drinking water from sources that are more than 500 meters
away from their premises. There are a high percentage of such households in the
States of Manipur, Tripura, Orissa, Meghalaya Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh. We
should identify, by getting information from Census Office, the villages where
households have to travel more than 500 meters to fetch water and villages
where households are dependent on unimproved sources of drinking water and
cover such villages/habitations on the highest priority.
It is a matter of
concern that only 30.80% of rural households have access to tap water. Major
States like Bihar, Jharkhand, Assam, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh lag behind in
the coverage with tap water supply.
It is also a fact
that about 85% of all drinking water sources in the rural areas of the country
are based on underground sources. In many areas, cases of chemical
contamination of drinking water supply with contaminants like Arsenic, Fluoride
and Uranium and in recent times, man-made pollution with heavy metals and
pesticides is coming to the fore. After trying various treatment technologies,
it is increasingly clear to us that the safest and most durable long term
solution is to provide the affected population with piped water supply from
uncontaminated sources even if distant.
In the 12th Five
Year Plan, we will have to give emphasis on ensuring satisfactory service
delivery. Though there have been large investments in the sector, and many
water supply schemes set up, we have to ensure that commissioned schemes do not
slip back to nonfunctional status. This often happens due to poor Operation and
Maintenance of water supply systems, non availability of affordable and
dependable power supply with many States charging commercial rates for rural
pumping stations and fluctuations in voltage and frequency. These need urgent
attention at the State level. In this connection, I would request the States to
provide electricity for rural drinking water supply schemes atleast
those run by Gram Panchayats at domestic rates, if not at agricultural rates.
This will help Gram Panchayats to provide continuous drinking water supply.
I would also
suggest that States adopt an Operation and Maintenance policy laying down the
provisions for ensuring continuous operation and maintenance of rural drinking
water supply schemes. India is fast becoming a water stressed country. It is
the need of the hour to focus on improving water use efficiency in all sectors
including in drinking water sector. States should take up water audits
(including such audits for water being used for agriculture and industry),
install bulk and individual water meters and mandate installation of water efficient
fixtures. There is also a need to have more water efficient buildings and
structures having technologies which minimize the use of water. We can think of
stopping leaking taps and having push button taps, having rain water harvesting
on building roofs, use of recycled water, etc. Over the past decade, we have
had increased investment in the drinking water sector. From about Rs. 2000
crore in 2002-03, the investment has increased in the Bharat Nirman period to
Rs.10,500 crore in 2012-13.
The Government of
India is bringing about a major paradigm shift in the National Rural Drinking
Water Programme in the XIIth
Five Year plan period, to fulfill the rising expectations of the rural
population. This shift includes firstly, proposing to increase the service
levels of providing drinking water supply to rural areas from 40 litres per
capita per day (lpcd) to 55 lpcd.
The 40 lpcd norm is in place since 1972 and all
States have been asked to start planning for a higher level of water supply.
With this we will begin to bridge the gap somewhat in service levels between
urban areas and rural areas. Under NRDWP States have the flexibility to fix
their own supply norms. I would therefore urge States
to target 55 lpcd norm for
all future rural drinking water supply schemes. This can enable higher level of
household connections, thereby reducing the burden on women and girls in
fetching water from handpumps and public taps and reducing risk of
contamination.
Secondly, looking
at the fact that there is over extraction of ground water in most parts of the
country, due to requirements of drinking, agriculture and industry, we have
decided in principle to shift the focus away from ground water to surface
water. We have to therefore reduce our dependence on groundwater by adopting
conjunctive use of surface, rain and ground water. In this regard, we hope that
more surface water sources will be tapped to ensure sustainable water supply in
water stressed and quality affected areas. I urge all States to look at this
seriously.
To assist States
affected with Chemical contamination of drinking water, and those States which
have cases of Japanese and Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (JE/AES), we have made a
provision under the NRDWP for an earmarked fund for Water Quality and have
allocated 5% of the NRDWP funds for it. I would urge the affected States to utilise the funds released expeditiously and send proposals
for release of the second installment.
The performance of
States in utilizing the Support and the Water Quality Monitoring and
Surveillance Funds, both of which are meant to strengthen the software capacity
and activities of States, and both of which are fully funded by the Government
of India, is not satisfactory. I urge the States to plan to optimally utilize allocations
under these components.
Awareness
generation about protecting drinking water sources from contamination, regular
testing of drinking water sources, conserving rainwater in tanks and ponds,
water recharge, water saving devices, all have to be increased. This can be
done only by intensive IEC campaigns and training of Panchayat representatives,
engineers and water administrators.
My Ministry has
identified Key Resource Centres to provide training on various aspects of rural
drinking water sector. I request States to depute their engineers, PRI
representatives and other participants to these training programmes and make
full use of them. I also request States to identify their own State Key
Resource Centres at State and district level to give training at district and
block levels.
We have also
written to States to make use of services of Regional and State offices of
DAVP, PIB, Field Publicity, Song and Drama Division and the like, in addition
to State Information and Publicity Departments for preparing Media Plans so as
to ensure effective use of IEC funds.
Interpersonal
communication is the most effective form of awareness generation. In this
regard, I would like to bring to your notice that we have recently permitted
States to give an incentive of Rs.75 per connection to ASHA workers for
motivating households to take household tap connections. We, in collaboration
with UNICEF are also going to prepare a Communication and Advocacy Strategy for
providing a framework for planning and implementing IEC activities in rural
drinking water sector.
We are preparing a
World Bank assisted rural drinking water supply and sanitation project with an
outlay of more than Rs. 5000 cr for promoting piped
water supply and strengthen institutions and systems in this sector in the
States of Assam, Bihar, and Jharkhand and Eastern UP. It is expected to make a
fundamental change in the rural water supply sector in these States we hope to
use the learning from this project in other similarly placed states.
An important
initiative is the Project of setting up of a Solar
powered Dual pump based water supply scheme in 10,000 habitations in 82
Integrated Action Plan districts in 9 States. This will bring piped water
supply to habitations where power supply is not available. Some States are yet
to send their proposals in this regard. I request them to send proposals
immediately.
The Management
Devolution Index (MDI) developed by my Ministry to measure the depth of
devolution of functions, funds and functionaries in rural drinking water sector
to Panchayats has now become a best practice and an example to different
Ministries of Govt of India for their own developmental programmes. States
which have devolved authority to the PRIs shall get higher allocation. I urge
States to devolve more and more funds and functions to PRIs so that they can
play a greater role in managing their own drinking water supply.
My Ministry is
making all efforts to obtain higher resource allocation for rural drinking
water supply considering the large demand. In this effort, our hands will be
strengthened if States utilise the available funds
expeditiously and submit the required audit certificates and documents. I
request Hon Ministers of States to direct their officers to carefully send all
the required documents to enable release of funds without delay.
I invite you all to
provide inputs and suggestions that can improve the way we administer the
drinking water programme.
In conclusion, I
would like to call upon State governments to come forward and strengthen not
only the infrastructure in the rural water supply but also carry out related
software and extension activities effectively so that we are able to provide
our rural population with adequate and safe drinking water supply on a sustainable
basis.”
The Secretary
Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation Shri Pankaj Jain said in his
opening remarks that States should comply with Supreme Court’s order regarding
coverage of schools with Water Supply and send reports on 1st March,
15th March and 31st March 2013.
He said that the
Consultation with State Secretaries in New Delhi on 18/02/2013 made following
Recommendations:
·
States should
consider adopting Ranney Well technology wherever feasible so as to reduce over
dependence on ground water and shift to surface water use as drinking water
source. Madhya Pradesh and Jharkhand have expressed willingness.
·
Time bound system
has to be put in place for obtaining permission from Railways and from National
Highways for water pipe lines crossing them. Gujarat and Kerala should write to
MDWS regarding this to enable us to take it up with the concerned Ministries.
·
Inter-ministerial
coordination is required for use of water resources by agriculture and industry
by various Ministries so as to protect the provision for drinking water.
·
A discussion was
held on the use of R.O plants and the concept of ATW (ATW) plants in villages.
R O plants can be set up where alternative safe surface water sources are not
available in Arsenic/Fluoride and Salinity affected habitations. Selection of the villages is important and
environmental issues should be considered looking into the problem of reject
management.
·
Card system for
sanitary surveillance of drinking water can be adopted by States with suitable
modifications to make it more practical and make the assessment process more
reliable.
·
IMMT Bhubaneswar
has transferred terafil technologies to 200 agencies which may be used for
tackling iron contamination.
·
O & M model
report of WSP-World Bank can be studied. State can adapt the available models
to suit specific requirement of schemes and the State context.
·
Further a study of
different O & M models followed in the country needs to be done and a
report prepared to guide States.
·
States should
comply with Supreme Court’s order regarding coverage of schools with Water
Supply and send reports on 1st March, 15th March and 31st
March 2013.
·
A panel of hydrogeologists to be prepared by MDWS for use of any States who are
unable to obtain services of hydrogeologists on hire.
·
Discussion was held
on the role of Key Resource Centers and the need to involve them in IEC
activities and in practical demonstrations of models and good practices.
·
The health
consequences of the quality problems of drinking water need to be monitored.
Therefore the profiling of diseases and its geographical distribution needs to
be linked with quality testing results. The MDWS should set up a Committee to
strengthen the monitoring of health impacts of drinking water and linkage with
water quality monitoring.
·
The Andhra Pradesh
model of sub divisional labs is a cost effective one and can be considered by
other States for adoption.
·
It was observed
that many States have not utilized the funds available especially the Support
Fund and the Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance Fund. States need to look at those activities
urgently.
·
The Ministry should
empanel agencies/experts for taking up IEC activities at the State level.
·
There is a need for
a Communication Strategy for Rural Drinking Water Supply, similar to the
Advocacy and Communication Strategy finalized for Sanitation last year. The
methodology of use of messages including publicity as well as inter-personal
communication mechanism has to be clearly spelt out.
YSKataria